EMAIL Outsourcing
Solutions From CIO-On-Call
- The Economics
The decision to outsource the EMAIL
function is driven by a number of factors, however the cost savings
is typically the main driver. The savings is indeed
impressive, especially for smaller firms that want to assure a
failure proof messaging solution. The charts that are
presented here compare EMAIL cost for two scenarios; the first is an
internal implementation and the second is an outsourced scenario.
The Internal Implementation Of
Exchange
The internal implementation assumes
that a company builds a two-server clustered Exchange environment to
assure high availability, as well as having a failover cluster for
Disaster Recovery in a backup Data Center. Each of those
environments contains a server for Web access to EMAIL (Outlook Web
Access or OWA server) and an SMTP Gateway server to provide Internet
EMAIL. Standard external peripherals such as tape backup and
external storage are included, however no Data Center Costs are
included.

Internal Implementation Versus
Outsourcing - Comparing The Costs
The costs of implementation that have
been calculated above are now plugged into two comparative analysis,
one for a 400 person environment and one for a 100 person
environment. The Cash outlay is amortized over a 3 year
period.
As can be seen from the charts, the
400 user environment would cost $35.34 per month to host internally,
versus $15.98 to outsource. Aside from the massive savings,
the function is outsourced to a first class Microsoft Gold Partner,
who has solved all of the issues associated with clustering, backup
and restoration, Virus protection, Spam, and Disaster Recovery.

Through CIO-On-Call
services, NewVista Advisors serves as a trusted member of your
management team, integrating technology decisions with business
operations and goals. Identifying opportunities and innovative
ideas, developing the necessary information for effective decisions,
and guiding these ideas through implementation, NewVista Advisors
fills the technology leadership gap.
|